![]() “Rest assured that the board has exhausted all possible resources in arriving at this decision as we have not hesitated in the past to sanction filmmakers/ producers/distributors for exhibiting the fictitious ’nine-dash line’ in their materials.” “Instead, the map portrayed the route of the make-believe journey of Barbie from Barbie Land to the ’real world’, as an integral part of the story,” the censorship board said. The censors began examining Barbie last week after Vietnam reportedly banned the film over scenes featuring a map showing the so-called nine-dash line, which China uses to justify its maritime claims.īeijing claims almost the entire South China Sea, despite rival claims from other south-east Asian countries, including the Philippines, Malaysia and Vietnam.Īfter “meticulous” scrutiny of the film, Philippine censors were convinced that the “cartoonish map” did not depict the nine-dash line. World + 17 more UNICEF East Asia and Pacific Region Humanitarian Situation Report No.After reviewing the film twice and consulting foreign affairs officials and legal experts, the government’s movie and television review and classification board said it would allow it to be screened. More information on the Committee’s Follow-up on Concluding Observations procedure and on the methodology of the maps. The States that appear higher in the ranking system are the ones that have received higher grades by the Committee, while the ones at the bottom received the lowest scores. The map 3 is a ranking of the Implementation Assessment of all States, so out of all the States that did submit information to the Committee in a timely manner. States that do submit information in a timely manner to the Committee are displayed in the map 2 with the relevent information on the implementation of the recommendations.īy clicking on each State, the user has information on the topic of the recommendations selected, the grading given to each of them by the Committee, and the year in which the assessment was made. This map also includes States that, for whatever reason, have not received an assessment by the Committee yet (listed as "No Follow-up Ever"). The latter are the States that receive from the Committee a grade D due to non-cooperation. ![]() This map allows identifying which States are submitting follow-up information to the Committee, and which have not yet responded despite the deadlines and the reminders sent by the Committee. Map 1: Cooperation with the Human Rights Committee in the follow-up procedure This complements the initiatives carried out by the Centre in favor of the follow-up of recommendations (follow-up missions with the authorities, campaigns to disseminate the recommendations, drafting of civil society follow-up reports to assess the progress made by the States). All these findings are now easly accessible on our lCCPR Follow-up World Maps. ![]() The Committee then assesses all the information submitted and provides a separate grade for each urgent recommendation based on its level of implementation. Following this, States have a period of 3 years to provide any information to the Committee on measures taken to fulfill the recommendations and improve the civil and political rights situation in the countries.Ĭivil society organizations are also allowed to participate in the process by submitting reports. Out of these concluding observations, the Committee highlights around three urgent recommendations that should be prioritized by each State. This initiative intends to facilitate access and disseminate the Human Rights Committee's concluding observations for all States Parties as well as the status of their implementation.ĭuring the consideration of every State report, the Human Rights Committee analyzes breaches of international obligations and publishes concluding observations in the form of recommendations to each State party. ![]() Screenshot 1 View the interactive content page ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |